生态批评第四次浪潮:物质生态批评
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

I0

基金项目:

湖南省社科基金外语联合项目“韩少功和梭罗的生态书写比较研究”(20WLH14)


The Fourth Wave of Ecocriticism: Material Ecocriticism
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    物质生态批评继承了生态批评的跨学科研究传统,汲取了新物质主义的理论精华,推动生态批评进入了第四次浪潮,标志着生态批评向物质维度的转向。从理论内核看,物质生态批评着重凸显非人类物质所具有的主体性与能动性,对传统认知中人类与非人类物质之间的关系进行了重新界定。研究者借助这一批评理论,深入分析非人类物质的能动性及其叙事能力,试图解读现实社会与文学世界中构建的物质生命共同体。物质生态批评致力于弥合人类与非人类物质之间的假定鸿沟,进一步批判了人类中心主义思想,突破了传统生态批评在人与自然、文化与自然、种族与自然等方面的二元对立思维模式。不过,物质生态批评对于如何应对当下生态危机的窘境也没有清晰的方案,本质上看,其还只是未完成的物质故事理论。

    Abstract:

    Material Ecocriticism inherits the interdisciplinary research tradition of Ecocriticism and absorbs the theoretical essence of New Materialism, thus pushing Ecocriticism into the fourth wave, marking its important turn to the material dimension. From a theoretical perspective, Material Ecocriticism emphasizes the subjectivity and agency of non-human matter, redefining the relationship between human and non-human matter in traditional cognition. Researchers use this critical theory to deeply analyze the agency and narrative ability of non-human matter, attempting to interpret the material life community constructed in the real society and literary world. Material Ecocriticism is committed to bridging the assumed gap between human and non-human matter, further criticizing anthropocentric thinking, and breaking through the traditional Ecocriticism’s binary oppositional thinking patterns in human and nature, culture and nature, race and nature, and other aspects. However, Material Ecocriticism lacks a definitive strategy for addressing the ongoing ecological crisis. At its core, it remains an incomplete theory of matter story.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

龚玲.生态批评第四次浪潮:物质生态批评[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2025,30(5):32-39.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码