The formal basis for the promotion of the statutory penalty of “multiple sexual assaults on the same child victim and multiple sexual assaults on multiple children” is the typified behaviour that represents a serious infringement of legal interests. The substantive basis lies in the absolute increase in the necessity of special prevention. The assessment path from form to substance accurately describes the degree of legal interest infringement. A purely naturalistic interpretation of “multiple sexual assaults on the same child victim and multiple sexual assaults on multiple children” would exclude criminally punishable scenarios like “molesting two twice” from aggravated sentencing. In order to address the shortcomings of the current legal framework, a hermeneutic reconstruction based on the equivalance of legal interest violation is proposed from a normative perspective. In determining “multiple sexual assaults on multiple children”, the definition of victims should be generalized. Each act against every victim must constitute a completed offense, the criterion being the quantity of violated legal interests. When the same natural person is victimized multiple times, the perpetrator must have acted under separate criminal intent for each instance. For “multiple sexual assaults on the same child victim”, every instance must satisfy both subjective and objective constitutive elements, with the act reaching at least an attempted stage.