科技服务业与高技术制造业区域耦合协调发展
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F124.3;F224.0

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“产业协同集聚对产业链韧性的影响研究”(24FGLB033);教育部人文社科研究项目“中国半导体产业链韧性的生成逻辑、动态评价与政策协同研究”(23YJC790102);湖南省自然科学基金项目“产业协同集聚对绿色全要素生产率的影响机理及促进对策研究”(2023JJ30600)


Research on the Coupling and Coordinated Development of Science and Technology Service Industry and High-Tech Manufacturing Industry
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了把握科技服务业与高技术制造业(简称“两大产业”)的融合发展水平和空间分布特征,通过建立两大产业相关评价指标体系,运用熵值法与耦合协调度模型,测算我国30个省份及八大综合经济区的两大产业耦合协调发展水平,并运用Dagum基尼系数分解法,分析八大综合经济区耦合协调发展的差异水平及差异原因,同时构建纳入空间因素的计量模型对收敛性进行检验。研究发现:2011—2020年,全国两大产业融合发展呈现上升趋势,但耦合协调度处于过渡和协调发展区间的省市较少,融合发展水平不高;两大产业融合发展水平自东向西呈现递减趋势,不同区域的产业融合水平存在明显差异,导致区域总体差异的主要因素来自区域间差异;两大产业耦合协调水平的正空间相关关系持续且稳定,呈现显著的高-高和低-低聚集态势。八大综合经济区两大产业耦合协调水平收敛性检验结果表明:八大综合经济区中除黄河中游和西南经济区以外的经济区均存在明显的σ收敛;全国以及八大综合经济区表现出典型条件β收敛特征,但北部沿海和南部沿海综合经济区不存在绝对β收敛;此外,4个控制变量收敛性检验结果都不一样,表明八大综合经济区收敛的驱动因素也都不一样。

    Abstract:

    In order to grasp the integrated development level and spatial distribution characteristics of science and technology service industry and high-tech manufacturing industry (referred to as the “two industries”), this study establishes an evaluation index system for the two industries. Entropy method and coupling coordination degree model are used to measure the coupling and coordinated development levels of the two industries in 30 provinces and eight major comprehensive economic zones in China. The Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method is employed to analyze the differences and causes of coupling and coordinated development of the eight major comprehensive economic zones. Additionally, a spatial econometric model is constructed to test the convergence. It is found that, from 2011 to 2020, the integration development of the two industries nationwide showed an upward trend, but the number of provinces and cities with coupling coordination degrees in the transitional and coordinated development ranges was limited, indicating a relatively low level of integration development..The level of integration development exhibited a decreasing trend from east to west, with significant regional disparities in industrial integration levels. The main factor leading to the overall regional differences was inter-regional disparity. The positive spatial correlation of the coupling coordination level remained stable, showing a significant high-high and low-low clustering patterns. The convergence test results for the coupling coordination level of the two industries in the eight comprehensive zones indicated that, except for the Middle Yellow River and Southwest economic zones, the other six zones exhibited significant σ convergence. The nation as a whole and the eight comprehensive economic zones displayed typical conditional convergence characteristics,?but the Northern and Southern Coastal comprehensive economic zones did not show absolute β convergence. In addition, the convergence test results of the four control variables varied, indicating that the driving factors for convergence of the eight comprehensive economic zones were also different.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贺正楚,王京.科技服务业与高技术制造业区域耦合协调发展[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2025,30(2):1-14.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-04-08
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码