冯契以“史”“论”结合的学术立场诠释中国哲学史
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科基金重点项目“冯契的中国哲学史诠释理论研究”(16AZX012)


Feng Qi’s Annotation of the History of Chinese Philosophy: A Way of Combining History and Theory
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    冯契诠释中国哲学史的特色之一是坚持“史”“论”结合的学术立场。以“史”“论”结合的学术立场诠释中国哲学史的依据:其一,哲学是哲学史的总结,哲学史是哲学的展开;其二,哲学史的创作必须自觉地以某种哲学元理论为指导;其三,中国哲学史著作的创作者必须拥有哲学家和哲学史家的双重身份。冯契以“史”“论”结合的学术立场诠释中国哲学史经历了长达近半个世纪的历程,其包括20世纪40年代在西南联大清华研究院当研究生时思想的萌发,20世纪七八十年代在华东师范大学进行的探索与著述。冯契以“史”“论”结合的学术立场诠释中国哲学史体现在他以马克思主义哲学立场诠释中国哲学史,以“智慧”说哲学立场诠释中国哲学史,以“螺旋式圆圈结构”诠释中国哲学史。

    Abstract:

    One of the characteristics of Feng Qi’s annotation of the history of Chinese philosophy is his adherence to the academic standpoint of combining history with theory. The basis for his academic standpoint is as follows. Firstly, philosophy is the summary of the history of philosophy, and the history of philosophy is the development of philosophy. Secondly, the production of the history of philosophy must be consciously guided by a certain philosophical meta-theory. Thirdly, the author of Chinese philosophical history works must be a philosopher and philosophical historian. Feng Qi has experienced half a century of annotating the history of Chinese philosophy by integrating history with theory, from the 1940s in Tsinghua Research Institute of National Southwest Associated University when he was a graduate student, to the days during the 1970s and 1980s in East China Normal University. His academic standpoint of combining history with theory is reflected in his employment of the Marxist philosophy, wisdom theory, and the theory of spiral circle structure.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王向清.冯契以“史”“论”结合的学术立场诠释中国哲学史[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2023,28(6):15-21.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码