论训诂二法之局限 ——以王叔岷《古籍虚字广义》中 “以”犹“虽”、“与”为“其”为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


On the Limitation of the Two Exegetical Methods: Take “以”is“虽”& “与”is“其” of Wang Shumin,s Guji Xuzi Guangyi as Instances
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    王叔岷《古籍虚字广义》一书阐发“新义”时多采用传统训诂二法“互文”及“异文”。“互文”的局限在于互训的两词应满足在句中句法分布相同的条件,不满足此条件的结论通常有误,如《广义》中释“以”犹“虽”有误;“异文”的局限在于比对时的语句当选取同类型结构语句,而非仅选取描述同一事件的语句,否则结论一般有误,如《广义》中释“与”为“其”有误。

    Abstract:

    The “new meaning” in Wang Shumin’s Guji Xuzi Guangyi mostly developed by the two traditional exegetical methods of “intertextuality” and “distertextuality”. The limitation of intertextuality lies in the fact that the two words of intertextuality should meet the condition of the same syntactic distribution in the sentence, and the conclusion that does not meet this condition is usually wrong, such as the wrong interpretation of “以” is “虽” in Guangyi; the limitation of “distertextuality” lies in that the same type of structural sentence is selected for comparison rather than only the sentence describing the same event, otherwise the conclusion is generally wrong, such as the wrong interpretation of “与” is “其” in Guangyi.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王路宁.论训诂二法之局限 ——以王叔岷《古籍虚字广义》中 “以”犹“虽”、“与”为“其”为例[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2021,26(1):121-128.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码