Under the overall context that judicial power belongs to the central power, judicial power can be understood from such two perspectives as ownership and implementation. But even if the central expenditure responsibility of judicial power is strengthened, “localization” can not be absolutely abandoned. To give full play to the initiative and enthusiasm of the local government is a basic principle that the state organs must follow. The proper separation of ownership and commitment of power will not damage the existing constitutional system and the direction of reform. According to the principle that the central government should undertake the projects that maintain the basic funds of the court and have small individual differences, and that the local government has the right of statutory approval and that the projects with large individual differences should be undertaken by the local government, we can appropriately allocate the expenditure responsibilities between the central and local governments. This move can not only achieve the main purpose of improving the level of security, but also ease the realistic pressure of financial and property control and fully mobilize them, realizing the long-term development of the work of the people's courts.