买卖型担保的效力研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Research on the Effectiveness of BuyandSell Guarantee
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    根据担保方式的不同,买卖型担保可分为物权性担保及债权性担保。物权性担保实为让与担保,不具有担保物权地位;债权性担保所表现出的买卖合同因双方虚伪表示而归于无效,所承载的代物清偿协议因违反流押禁令而无效,亦不具有担保作用,债权人无权要求债务人交付买卖标的物,但在标的物交付后可行使清算权保障自身债权,该清算权无优先受偿性。

    Abstract:

    According to the difference of guarantee types, buyandsell guarantee can be divided into real right guarantee and obligatory right guarantee. Real right guarantee is alienation guarantee and has no security interest position.The buyandsell contract represented by the debt guarantee is invalidated due to the hypothetical representation of both parties, and the substitution repayment agreement is invalid because it violates the prohibit mortgage, hence having no guarantee effect.The creditor has no right to require the debtor to deliver the subject matter of the transaction, but after the delivery of the subject matter, he or she can exercise the liquidation right to protect his or her own rights. The liquidation right has no priority for repayment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

卞贵龙.买卖型担保的效力研究[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2018,23(4):51-56.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码