论原因自由行为的可罚性
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


On the Inculpation of Actio Libera in Cause
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    关于原因自由行为的可罚性理由,有间接正犯类似说等多种学说,但都无法改变将追究责任的基础奠基于原本属于预备行为的原因行为的事实,并且都有扩张实行行为概念之嫌。由于不作为犯的成立不需要行为能力和责任能力,以及过失的作为犯没有自己独立的行为,处罚这两者的原因自由行为本来就不违背“实行行为与责任能力同时存在”原则;而将故意作为犯中的责任能力(欠缺)解释为犯罪成立的消极要素、免责事由,可以更合理地解释故意作为犯的原因自由行为的可罚性问题。此外,有必要区分事实性行为和规范性行为。

    Abstract:

    Although there are many theories on the inculpation of Actio Libera in Cause, none is acceptable, for they all put the basis of penalty in the Cause action, which is a behavior of preparing, and all may expand the concept of perpetrating act. In fact, because the accomplishing of omission does not need active ability and responsibility and the negligence crime doesn't have its own action, it does not contradict with the principle of responsibility and legally prescribed punishment. As to the inculpation of intention crime's Actio Libera in Cause, it is advisable to interpret the deficiency of responsibility as a negative element of criminal composition, which is a forgivable reason of the offender but cannot be abused by those malicious persons. Finally, it is necessary for us to distinguish the factual action and the normative action.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周剑君.论原因自由行为的可罚性[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2018,23(3):83-88.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-08
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码