扰乱法庭秩序罪修正的慎思与评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Reflection amd Comment on the Ammendments to the Crime of Disturbing the Court Order ——Based on the Amendments to Criminal Law
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《刑法修正案(九)》对法庭秩序罪作了重大修改,增加并细化了具体罪状。此罪具有地点时间的特定性、侵害法益的复杂性,但扰乱法庭正常审判活动秩序是核心要素。正确理解和适用此项罪名应当恪守严格解释的立场,明确该罪行为主体要件应为一般主体;细化行为具体时空条件,行为发生时间应当包含庭审准备阶段的行为;严格解释行为客体要件,“侮辱”“诽谤”与刑法分则中的侮辱、诽谤罪应当具有相同含义,但是以网络方式实施的侮辱诽谤行为不应当包括在内。“威胁”并不是指一般性的恐吓,而是指以杀害、伤害、毁坏财物、毁坏名誉等相威胁,达到侵害法益紧迫危险的程度的行为。

    Abstract:

    Amendments to Criminal Law (ix) has made significant modifications to the crime of disturbing court order, added and refined the specific counts. This crime has the specificity of time and place, complexity of infringing legal interests, but the core element is disturbing the normal court trial order. To correctly understand and apply such charges, we should abide by the position of strict interpretation, be clear that the main behavioral subject of the crime should be general subject; specify the time and spatial conditions of behaviors, including those in the trial preparation; strictly interpret the objective elements, for instance, the crime of insult and the crime of defamation should have the same legal meaning with those in the criminal law, but those committed in the internet should not be included. “Menace” does not mean the “intimidation” in common sense, but refers to the behavior infringing the legal interests of others to an urgent and dangerous degree by threatening to kill, hurt, destroy property or reputation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张晶,李 灿.扰乱法庭秩序罪修正的慎思与评价[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2016,21(4):63-67.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-10-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码