Since Chao proposed that the “relative-internal structure” corresponds with depiction and the “relative-external structure” relates to limitation, it has been echoed by Lv Shuxiang and Lu Binfu. This correlation is denied by Tang Zhengda, which, based on statistics, maintains that the position of relative clause depends on the object of relativization. While pointing out that what Tang denies is merely the commonest way of correlation between the position of relative clause and its pragmatic function, it backs up Zhao by proposing and demonstrating a markedness pattern between the two categories. More evidences of cognitive science and psychological studies are provided at the end.