论网络司法拍卖的关系主体及其法律责任
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


On the Relation Subject and Legal Liability of Online Judicial Auction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由于传统司法拍卖带来了各种问题,各地法院积极探索司法拍卖网络化改革。上海的网拍平台仍以拍卖公司为主体,属于“改良派”;重庆引入产权交易机构,与法院实为公法上的委托合同关系,属于“改革派”;而浙江、江苏的淘宝网模式完全以法院作为拍卖主体,是当之无愧的“革命派”。在现有制度设计的基础上,解构各种模式中关系主体之间的法律关系,并充实相关责任承担的制度设计,具有积极的理论和实践探索意义。

    Abstract:

    Due to the various problems caused by the traditional judicial auction, the courts over China have made active exploration of the network reform of judicial auction. Shanghai’s online auction platform still treats auction company as the main body, belonging to the “Reformists”; Chongqing has introduced property right transaction institution whose relationship with the court is actually a contract relationship in public law, belonging to the “Innovationists”; Zhejiang, Jiangsu’s Taobao model entirely treats the court as the main body, belonging to the true “Revolutionaries”. On the basis of the current system design, to deconstruct the legal relationship among the relevant parties in all these models and to improve the system design of related responsibility is of positive theoretical and practical significance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高颖佳.论网络司法拍卖的关系主体及其法律责任[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2015,20(3):65-70.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-09-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码