我国补充侦查制度存在的问题及对策
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Problems of Supplementary Investigation System in China and the Countermeasures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由于“重实体、轻程序”的传统思想的影响和惩罚犯罪与保障人权的矛盾,我国补充侦查制度在理论与实践上存在着诸如公安机关与检察机关的补充侦查权限模糊、不必要或超期羁押使补充侦查超期严重等问题。针对这些问题,应通过进一步完善补充侦查制度,建立检察引导侦查制度,健全侦检沟通和配合机制,赋予检察机关对侦查机关违法违纪人员的处罚建议权等措施在立法和司法实践两方面予以改进和完善。

    Abstract:

    Due to the influence of the traditional viewpoint of “emphasizing the noumenon and neglecting the procedure” and the contradiction between punishing crime and protecting human rights, there still exists a lot of theoretical and practical problems in the supplementary investigation system in China, such as the illegibility of supplementary investigation right between public security organs and the procuratorial organs, long extension of supplementary investigation caused by unnecessary or over-due detainment. These problems are expected to be solved both in the sphere of legislation and judicial practice through further improving the supplementary investigation system, establishing the system of investigation under the procuratorial organ’s guide, strengthening the communication and cooperation mechanism between the public security and procuratorial organs, and authorizing the procuratorial organs rights of punishment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈源.我国补充侦查制度存在的问题及对策[J].《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2010,15(6):21-24.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-25
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-11-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码