不同悬挑长度的拉杆式与悬挑梁式脚手架对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划基金资助项目(2016YFC0701500);安徽四建科技开发基金资助项目(HYB20190118)


Comparative Study on the Pull-Rod and Cantilever-Beam Scaffolds with Different Cantilever Lengths
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了能给拉杆式与悬挑梁式脚手架选型提供参考,采用对两种不同悬挑长度脚手架建模的方法,对两种脚手架进行力学性能分析与经济效益分析。结果表明,相较于悬挑梁式脚手架,拉杆式悬挑脚手架的主梁应力小并且分布更加均匀,挠度更小;从经济效益、施工工艺和工期方面考虑,拉杆式悬挑脚手架平均节约54.03%的建造费用,且能缩短工期;设置张紧的钢丝绳对悬挑梁式脚手架的承载能力有很大提升,应定期检查钢丝绳的张紧程度。

    Abstract:

    In view of a reference for the selection of pull rod scaffold and cantilever beam scaffolds, a mechanical performance analysis and an economic benefit analysis have been carried out of the two kinds of scaffolds by adopting the method of modeling them with different cantilever lengths. The results show that, compared with the cantilever beam scaffold, the stress of the cantilever main beam tends to be smaller, with a more uniform distribution, and a smaller deflection. The results show that, compared with the cantilever-beam scaffold, the stress of the main beam of the cantilever is smaller and more evenly distributed with a smaller deflection. Considering the economic benefits, construction process and construction period, the average cost saving of the pull-rod cantilever scaffold is 54.03% with a shortened construction period. Setting the tensioned steel wire rope helps to greatly improve the bearing capacity of the cantilever-beam scaffold, while a regular check should be taken of the tensioning degree of the steel wire rope.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

侯天赐,李大华.不同悬挑长度的拉杆式与悬挑梁式脚手架对比研究[J].湖南工业大学学报,2023,37(2):9-15.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-31
  • 出版日期: