湖南践行“两山论”效果测评与比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

湖南省重点研发计划基金资助项目(2019SK2191)


Evaluation and Comparative Study on the Implementation the “Theory of Two Mountains” in Hunan Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于2014—2018年统计数据并结合熵值法赋权,以湖南省14市(州)为研究对象,对“两山论”实践效果进行了量化测评。结论如下:湖南14个市(州)“两山论”实践效果分值表明,郴州和长沙“两山论”实践效果最好,娄底最差,其余市(州)有差异但相差不大;生态资源方面,郴州最丰富,湘潭劣势最明显;环境现状方面,湘西州状态最好,邵阳压力最大;经济社会方面,长沙水平最高,邵阳垫底;管理响应方面郴州表现最突出,湘潭其次,张家界最差;环境潜力方面,怀化最小,长沙则全省遥遥领先。

    Abstract:

    Based on the statistical data from 2014 to 2018, combined with the weighting of entropy method, a quantitative evaluation has been made of the practical effect of the “Theory of Two Mountains” with 14 cities and prefectures in Hunan Province as the research object. The conclusions are as follows: the practical effect of the theory among 14 cities and states in Hunan Province shows that Chenzhou and Changsha have scored the highest mark, while Loudi has been given the lowest rating, with the other cities and states diverse in ranking but of little significance. In terms of ecological resources, Chenzhou is the most abundant one while Xiangtan exhibits the most obvious disadvantages; in terms of environmental status, Xiangxi Prefecture is in the best in condition, while Shaoyang is under the greatest pressure. Changsha has the highest level of economical and social development, and Shaoyang is ranked at the bottom. In terms of management response, Chenzhou is the most outstanding, Xiangtan is the second and Zhangjiajie is the worst. Huaihua is characterized with the minimum environmental potential, while Changsha is leading the head of the entire province.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

傅晓华,王 赫,梁颖宜,傅泽鼎,郑清星,宋心语.湖南践行“两山论”效果测评与比较研究[J].湖南工业大学学报,2022,36(3):59-69.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-18
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-10
  • 出版日期: 2022-05-01