西部民族地区乡村旅游景点类型与时空格局分析 ——以黔东南州为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


An Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Patterns with a Category of Rural Tourist Attractions in Western Ethnic Areas: A Case Study of Qiandongnan Autonomous Prefecture
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    运用ArcGIS技术与计量数学方法对贵州省黔东南苗族侗族自治州104个乡村旅游景点的类型分类、时间变化特征、空间格局分布特征和发展等级结构展开研究。研究结果表明:黔东南州乡村旅游景点类型可划分为4个一级类别和10个二级类别,各类别旅游景点发展规模和空间结构差异较大。从时间演变看,2004—2012年为黔东南州乡村旅游发展的起步阶段,此阶段4个一级类别的乡村旅游景点发展规模较小,增长速度缓慢;2012—2018年为黔东南州乡村旅游发展的增速阶段,此阶段乡村旅游发展规模有了一定的成效,提速明显。从空间演变看,4个一级类别的乡村旅游景点整体分布不均衡,交通条件和水资源环境对各类型景点的空间分布有巨大影响,区域内乡村旅游景点整体集聚程度较高。各县市间乡村旅游景点的发展等级指数存在差异,雷山县的发展等级指数最高,指数为2.68;麻江县、天柱县、镇远县最低,指数均为0.14。

    Abstract:

    By adopting ArcGIS technology and econometric method, a study has been carried out on the classification, time change characteristics, spatial pattern distribution characteristics and development level structure of 104 rural tourist attractions in Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Guizhou Province. The results show that the rural tourist attractions in Qiandongnan Prefecture can be divided into four first-class categories and ten second-class categories with a great difference in the development scale and spatial structure of each category. From the perspective of temporal evolution, 2004—2012 is the initial stage of rural tourism development in Qiandongnan Prefecture, a period with a relatively small development scale and slow growth rate of the four first-class categories of rural tourism attractions. 2012—2018 is a stage witnessing the rural tourism development in Qiandongnan Prefecture, with the rural tourism development scale achieving certain results with an obvious acceleration. From the perspective of spatial evolution, rural tourism attractions under the 4 first-level categories are unevenly distributed, while the traffic conditions and water resources have a huge impact on the spatial pattern of rural tourism attractions, with a relatively high overall concentration of rural tourist attractions in the region. There is a great discrepancy in the development ranking index of rural tourist attractions between counties and cities, with Leishan County characterized with the highest development ranking index of 2.68; Majiang County, Tianzhu County and Zhenyuan County an index of 0.14, the lowest one among all.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

许梦阳,曾彦嘉,高明惠.西部民族地区乡村旅游景点类型与时空格局分析 ——以黔东南州为例[J].湖南工业大学学报,2020,34(4):90-98.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-07-10
  • 出版日期: