几种常用边坡稳定性分析方法的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学基金资助重点项目(13JJ2033)


Comparison of Several Common Methods of Slope Stability Analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于仿真软件Geo-Slop,应用Morgenstern-Price法、Spencer法、Janbu法和Bishop法,分别对深圳外环高速公路某路堑边坡在天然状态和饱和状态下进行稳定性分析,计算得到最危险滑裂面以及相应的边坡安全系数。同时,根据现场调查,基于不平衡推力法分析出边坡最可能的滑裂面,并计算得到沿该滑裂面的安全稳定系数。通过数值分析和现场调查结果对比,得出以下结论:坡体在天然状态的安全系数大于1.0,接近1.2,边坡是稳定的,而在饱和状态下其安全系数小于1.0,坡体不稳定;数值计算分析得到的滑裂面位置与现场调查分析得出的滑裂面的位置一致,证明了结果的可靠性;最后,考虑到该地区雨水多发,坡体在饱和状态下安全系数小于1.0,建议及时对坡体进行支护,防止边坡失稳。

    Abstract:

    Four methods including Morgenstern-Price method, Spencer method, Bishop method and Janbu method have been introduced for an analysis of the stability of a cutting slope at Shenzhen outer-ring highway under natural condition and saturated state by using a simulation software Geo-Slope, thus working out the safety factors for the most dangerous slip surface as well as its corresponding slope. Meanwhile, based on the field investigation and unbalanced thrust method, an analysis has been carried out, thus obtaining the stability factor for the most probable slip surface of slope. By comparing the results of numerical analysis and field investigation, the following conclusions are drawn: The slope is stable when its body safety factor in a natural state is greater than 1.0, approaching 1.2, while the slope is unstable when the safety factor of the slope is less than 1.0 under saturated condition. The position of slip surface obtained by numerical calculation and analysis is consistent with that obtained by field investigation and analysis, thus verifying the reliability of the results. Consequently, with such factors as the frequent rainwater in this area and a subsequent slope safety factor under saturation condition less than 1.0, it is suggested to support the slope in time to prevent the slope from losing stability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

祝方才,刘佳鹏,刘增杰.几种常用边坡稳定性分析方法的比较[J].湖南工业大学学报,2019,33(2):1-5.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-05-01
  • 出版日期: