某软土路基处理经济技术方案对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51108176)


Contrast and Analysis of Soft Soil Subgrade Treatment Economic and Technical Schemes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以广州市南沙开发区某路段K0+660~K0+843总计577 m的软土地基路段地基处理工程为例,对比分析了水泥土搅拌桩法、真空预压+塑料排水板法、碎石桩法、袋装砂井+堆载预压法、楔形夯实水泥土桩法5种常见地基处理方法的施工工艺及工程造价。结果表明:几种地基处理方法工程造价的高低依次为,袋装砂井+堆载预压法<塑料排水板+真空预压法<楔形夯实水泥土桩法<水泥土搅拌桩(粉体喷搅法)<振冲碎石桩法;塑料排水板+真空预压法、碎石桩法、楔形夯实水泥土桩法3种地基处理方法都能达到较好的处理效果;水泥土搅拌桩法、碎石桩法、楔形夯实水泥土桩法3种处理方法的施工周期都较短。根据实际工程特点,考虑各种地基处理方案的优缺点、经济技术、处理效果以及施工周期等因素,得出楔形夯实水泥土桩法为最佳方案。

    Abstract:

    Taking the example of a 577 m soft soil foundation treatment project in the road K0+660~K0+843 of Guangzhou Nansha development zone, contrasts and analyzes the construction technology and construction cost of five common foundation treatment methods of the cement-soil mixing pile method, the vacuum preloading+plastic drainage plate method, the gravel pile method, the bagged sand drain+stack preloading method and the wedge-shaped compaction soil cement pile method. The results show that the engineering cost from low to high is the bagged sand drain + stack preloading method < the plastic drainage plate + vacuum preloading method < the wedge rammed soil-cement pile method < the cement-soil mixing pile (powder spray mixing method) < the vibrational detritus stake method. Three methods of the plastic drainage plate + vacuum preloading, the gravel pile method and the wedge rammed soil-cement pile method achieve better treatment effect; The construction periods of the cement-soil mixing pile method, the gravel pile method and the wedge rammed soil-cement pile method are short. According to the practical engineering characteristics, considering various factors of ground treatment schemes’advantages and disadvantages, economic technology, treatment effect and construction period, it is concluded that the wedge rammed soil-cement pile method is the optimal solution.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

饶迁根,罗大生,何 杰,孟森松.某软土路基处理经济技术方案对比分析[J].湖南工业大学学报,2014,28(5):22-26.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-25
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-01-09
  • 出版日期: