论近亲属、监护人在组织乞讨罪中的犯罪主体地位
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Close Relatives and Guardians’ Principal Position in the Crime of Organizing Begging
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对近亲属、监护人能否成为组织乞讨罪犯罪主体的问题,刑事实务界基本上持肯定态度,而理论界则存在绝对否定论、相对否定论和肯定论三种观点。实际上,以上观点都或多或少存在缺陷。对于那些以乞讨为生的贫困家庭,近亲属和监护人以轻微暴力、胁迫手段组织残疾人、儿童从事乞讨活动,这最多只是一种轻微违法行为,并不构成犯罪。

    Abstract:

    To the problem whether the close relatives, guardians can become the subject of crime or not, the practitioners of criminal law have an affirmative view. But in theory there are absolute negative, relative negative and affirmative three views. In fact, more or less all the three views have defects. To the poor families whose means of survival is begging, if the close relatives, guardians force their disabled and children to beg by means of mild violence or coercion, they are not committing a crime but have committed a minor illegal act.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: